Central Corneal Thickness in Congenital Aniridia and its Role in Glaucoma in an Indian Population
Aim: To determine the range and distribution of central corneal thickness in patients with aniridia and compare with age- and sex-matched controls.
Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional observational case-control study performed at a tertiary eyecare hospital. All patients diagnosed with aniridia from June 2006 to April 2008 were enrolled. Patients were excluded if they had corneal oedema, central corneal scars, central aniridic keratopathy, or any history or signs suggestive of previous surgery or injury. Central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound
pachymetry and the mean of 5 measurements per eye was used as the study measurement. The results were compared with those of age- and sex-matched controls.
Results: The mean central corneal thickness in the aniridia group was 0.603 mm compared with 0.566 mm in the control group (p = 0.0083).
Conclusions: This study has determined the range and distribution of CCT in Indian patients with aniridia and substantiates the fact that patients with aniridia in an Indian cohort also have significantly thicker corneas. This needs to be considered for making accurate IOP measurements in these patients to ascertain the appropriate management.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work twelve (12) months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).